Fertility awareness-based methods for contraception: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials
|
Publication Information
|
| |
| Author(s) |
Publication Date |
Journal |
Volume |
Issue |
Start Page |
End Page |
| |
| Grimes, D.A., Gallo, M.F., Grigorieva, V., Nanda, K., Schulz, K.F. |
2005 |
Contraception |
72 |
2 |
85 |
90 |
Abstract:
CONTEXT: Fertility awareness-based (FAB) methods of family planning estimate the fertile days of the menstrual cycle whether by observing fertility signs such as cervical secretions and basal body temperature or by monitoring cycle days. The efficacy and acceptability of these methods are unclear.
METHODS:We retrieved and analyzed all randomized controlled trials that examined any FAB method used for contraception.
RESULTS: Because of poor methods and reporting, pregnancy rates could not be determined. A trial in Colombia found similar numbers of pregnancies among women randomized to the ovulation and symptothermal methods, but a trial in Los Angeles observed more pregnancies in the group assigned to the ovulation method. In the two American trials, recruitment of participants was unexpectedly difficult. Continuation rates were poor.
CONCLUSION: Despite intensive training and ongoing support, most participants in these trials discontinued prematurely. The comparative efficacy of these methods remains unknown. However, with the ovulation and symptothermal methods, pregnancies appear to be common; method continuation rates are low.
Address: Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. dgrimes@fhi.org
Related Links
Find out if you have free access to this full article. Click here.
This review is also published elsewhere:
Grimes, D.A. et al. (2004)
Topic Areas
Possible Reviews of Interest
- Ferreira,A.L., Lemos,A., Figueiroa,J.N., de Souza,A.I. (2009). Effectiveness of contraceptive counselling of women following an abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 14(1), 1-9.
- Lopez, L.M., Grimes, D.A., Gallo, M.F., Schulz, K.F. (2010). Skin patch and vaginal ring versus combined oral contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010(3), Art. No.: CD003552.
- Truitt,S.T., Fraser,A.B., Grimes,D.A., Gallo,M.F., Schulz,K.F. (2003). Combined hormonal versus nonhormonal versus progestin-only contraception in lactation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003(2), Art. No.: CD003988.
- Cook, L., Nanda, K., Grimes, D. (2003). Diaphragm versus diaphragm with spermicides for contraception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003(1), Art. No.: CD002031.
- Kuyoh, M.A., Toroitich-Ruto, C., Grimes, D.A., Schulz, K.F., Gallo, M.F., Lopez, L.M. (2002). Sponge versus diaphragm for contraception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2002(4), Art. No.: CD003172.
Focus of Review
- Adolescent Health
- Adult Health
- Sexual Health
- family planning
- pregnancy prevention
Intervention Strategies
- Behaviour modification
- provision of item/education/tools
- Creating supportive physical, social, and policy environments
- social support
- counselling, case management, home visiting, referral, or support group
Intervention Location
- Clinic
- Home
- Primary health care provider
Review Type
Population Characteristics
- Age Groups
- adolescents (13-19)
- adults (20-64)
- Gender
Top of Page